Next: The Disini Paper
Up: On the DotPH Comments
Previous: On the Potential for
The Guidelines, is a product
of more than five months of meetings which typically lasted
for more than three hours. This is in addition to the research
and consultations conducted by members of the Adboard on the position
of the different constituencies they represent. The primary
aim of The Guidelines is to create an environment where competition
in the PH ccTLD market can flourish and no individual or group of
individuals can control the market except by
providing superior service at the most cost-effective price.
Although not a perfect instrument, it had been presented through
two public hearings and subjected to an open consultation process
through which it had received no serious objections nor challenges
from any group nor individual except from Mr Disini and his
DotPH company.
Mr Disini disagrees with the basic foundations of The Guidelines.
It is not surprising that he would disagree with the
provisions which are based on those foundations.
The Disini Paper has shown that Mr Disini does not even recognize
the power of the government to oversee the PH ccTLD. It attempts to
stymie the entire reform process by
- attempting to debate minutiae rather than the substantial
issues and
- raising a veiled threat that the PH ccTLD Domain Name System
would cease to function should the government push for meaningful reforms
The threat is indeed real
because Mr Disini controls the resources which could bring the entire
PH ccTLD DNS into a halt. Should the PH ccTLD DNS be severely
affected by his actions, Mr Disini is solely to blame, not
the reform process itself.
Although Mr Disini has claimed that the Philippine government has
no sovereign right over the PH ccTLD, he himself can not claim
ownership of the PH ccTLD. Whether the proper entity
which controls the PH ccTLD is ICANN or the USG or some other
party, the Philippine government has the right to petition
and negotiate with that entity in behalf of the Philippine Internet
community. The Philippine government does not need
Mr Disini's permission to start such negotiations.
It is the author's hope that with
the full support of the local Internet community, with the exception
of Mr Disini and his companies, the government will stay its course.
It should be resolute in its avowed pursuit to open the PH ccTLD
to the community and to ensure that a level playing field exists
in the market.
Next: The Disini Paper
Up: On the DotPH Comments
Previous: On the Potential for
root
2004-04-29